A Parallel rail car carrying a white shipping container, blurred with speed across open desert under a blue sky.
85%

See how Parallel Systems cut infrastructure costs by 85% and kept every data point.

A rover crossing rippled desert dunes, seen from above.
$100k+

Cost savings on internal tooling that Astrolab saved with Sift.

An uncrewed aircraft in flight above a desert mountain range.
94%

Reduction in CX2's time to root cause and fault isolation, from days to hours.

Sift for Medical devices

Days of testing.

Evidence your team can use.

Bring device measurements, test conditions, and engineering findings from development, testing, and manufacturing into one shared workspace. Help engineers review their own runs, find events that need attention, and carry what they learn into the next test.

Find what deserves attention

in every long test.

Bring device measurements, test conditions, and engineering history into one shared record for the next design review.

Why did flow fall while commanded speed held?

Durability run 14 lost 8% of its flow near hour 62 while rotor speed held. Compare it with run 11, inspect the loop, and share the review.

Keep bench data, engineering findings, and review evidence connected as devices move from development into verification, production, and the field. Build on what’s already known and bring field learning back into design.

Development

Characterize how the device behaves and keep the baseline evidence for later verification.

Verification

Compare revisions and durability runs with earlier results, limits, and design context in reach.

Production testing

Apply established checks to every unit and trace results back to verification evidence.

Field investigation

Investigate returned devices with their test history available, and bring findings back into development.

Field findings inform development

For engineers

Get to answers faster.

For engineering leaders

Keep teams moving together.

For executives

See what’s ready.

Know what’s at risk.

Review long runs with earlier results and test conditions in reach. Reuse useful analysis and carry findings into the next test.

Standardize repeated reviews, share findings between R&D, test, and quality teams, and keep continuity from verification to production.

Bring verification progress, durability questions, and open findings into design reviews, so teams can prioritize the work that moves the device forward.

Proven on complex hardware programs.

These results come from adjacent engineering fields: autonomous rail, lunar rovers, and uncrewed aircraft. They are not medical-device outcomes.

Fits your stack.

Grows with your program.

Can our engineers keep using MATLAB and Python?

Yes. Engineers keep MATLAB and Python for their own analysis. Sift keeps console exports with the device, firmware, and procedure, and exports to CSV, Parquet, or MATLAB. Reports support the engineering review, and the decision stays with your team.

Can we compare durability runs across units and revisions?

Yes. Each run keeps its device, firmware, procedure, and operating conditions. Families align related runs to a shared reference point and compute the normal envelope, so a new run is compared against equivalent tests.

Can we bring in data from local or disconnected systems?

Yes. Consoles and DAQ systems on the bench often stay offline. Export the run when the test ends and import the file into Sift, where it joins the device, procedure, and earlier runs. Sift Edge can capture data locally where a connected workflow is needed.

Where can Sift run, and how is access controlled?

Sift runs as cloud SaaS, hybrid, or fully on-premises, including air-gapped environments, with the same capabilities in each. Access is set by asset, data set, and user group, and an audit log records every query. Sift Edge captures and views data beside the hardware, even offline.

Can we start with one repeated review?

Yes. Bring one representative test file and the checklist your team uses today. Sift engineers show how to make the data usable, compare related runs, and keep the evidence behind the decision. The same setup then extends to more benches and programs.

How should we measure the value?

Measure the workflow you start with: time from test completion to an engineering decision, review hours per run, and the effort spent maintaining data infrastructure. Sift customer stories report results in these terms, from review hours saved per engineer to infrastructure costs avoided.

Accelerate your hardware development

Start with the engineering question slowing your team down.

Bring a representative workflow, your data requirements, and the decision you need to make. Work with Sift to identify a useful starting point and how to evaluate it.

Talk to a Sift engineer

Explore the platform

Related insights

Image of the Test interface inside Sift rendered in extruded glass

CI/CD for hardware: why the best teams never stop testing

The most impactful practice in modern software development is now available for hardware. Sift enables continuous validation for complex machines. This is how CI/CD principles and Sift’s Rules give engineers continuous releases, greater certainty, and less risks and costs.
Read Full Post →

How Sift transforms hardware telemetry chaos into a trusted foundation for analysis

Sift gives hardware teams a consistent, governed way to work with telemetry making data easy to query, trust, and share across engineering workflows.
Read Full Post →
Talk to our engineers about how high-performance teams use Sift to unify data across the hardware lifecycle.
Get a Demo